An Official publication of The Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AsianCNS)

Search Article
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Subscribe Contacts Login  Facebook Tweeter
  Users Online: 4749 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

   Table of Contents      
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 445-446

Optimal surgical resection of intracranial epidermoid tumor: A tailored approach


1 Department of Neurosurgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission10-Jan-2021
Date of Decision19-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance10-Apr-2021
Date of Web Publication14-Sep-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S A Javadi
Imam Khomeini Hospital, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran 14191
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_12_21

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Javadi S A, Khan ZH. Optimal surgical resection of intracranial epidermoid tumor: A tailored approach. Asian J Neurosurg 2021;16:445-6

How to cite this URL:
Javadi S A, Khan ZH. Optimal surgical resection of intracranial epidermoid tumor: A tailored approach. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 3];16:445-6. Available from: https://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2021/16/3/445/324444

It is an honor for having been invited to write a commentary/guest editorial to the published paper titled, “Analysis of giant intraventricular and extraventricular epidermoids, defining risk factors for recurrence, an institutional experience.”[1] The current paper explicitly explains risk factors for recurrence in multi-compartment epidermoid tumors. The authors have provided a well-designed study and analysis to determine valuable preoperative information. Such information would clearly help surgeons to make timely decisions while attempting surgery on such critical cases. The patients were categorized into three groups including multi- and single-compartmental lesions. Tumors with preoperative capsular enhancement, multi-compartmental distribution in vertebrobasilar territory, large size, and presence of calcification have been cited as strong predictors for recurrence. It has also been claimed that endoscope-assisted surgery could reduce the risk of morbidity; however, the recurrence rate was not changed.[1]

According to the contemporary literature, there is no effective chemotherapy; moreover, radiotherapy has indication only in recurrent unresectable cases and furthermore carries the risk of malignant transformation of the residual tumor into squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment.[2],[3]

Epidermoid tumors typically occur and expand within cisterns and fissures, spreading through various corridors, often along the skull base.[2] The capsule is adherent to neurovascular structures in the majority of cases, which mandates conservative management. Therefore, the capsule would be left without manipulation to prevent major deficits and recurrence becomes inevitable. Sometimes, surgical resection of the recurrent tumor could be really challenging.[2],[3]

Natural history plays a significant role. Considering the age of the patients is critical in decision-making and subtotal resection would be justified in old cases with severe comorbidities. Some claim that total removal of the capsule prevents or delays recurrence and minimizes complications and improves long-term outcomes.[2],[4] Therefore, preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making are valuable in such patients. Moreover, several factors would assist in the prediction of recurrence.

Mass reduction of cyst contents in most cases usually results in marked improvement of the symptoms. However, although the number of the cases is limited, the strangulation of the affected nerves by the tumor capsule, not the cyst pressure, causes distortion of the nerve axis and nerve atrophy distal to the strangulation site, resulting in preoperative rapid and severe dysfunction. This mechanism has been reported with the sixth and seventh cranial nerves in cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cyst,[5] and young age and rapidly progressive neurological deficit might be the characteristics for strangulation of the affected nerves by the cyst capsule. A similar strangulation mechanism causing the trigeminal neuralgia as well has been reported.[6] In such cases, immediate decompression and release of the strangulating band of the epidermoid cyst wall might be essential to ameliorate the rapidly evolving deficit.

It is important to understand ways to optimize the extent of epidermoid tumor resection in an effort to prevent a recurrence. Some claim that total removal (gross total resection [GTR]) of epidermoid would decrease the overall rate of morbidity. Others believe that aggressive resection of tumor capsule challenges GTR.[2],[3] It seems that the removal of proliferative capsules minimizes the risk of regrowth. This has been supported by the significant difference in recurrence rates between subtotal and GTRs.[3]

Moreover, there is a high risk of aseptic meningitis and cranial nerve injury which challenge modern microsurgical techniques and surgical expertise. Intraoperative monitoring and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging are important adjuncts to improve the visualization of tumor and extent of surgical resection.[3],[4] Furthermore, the use of the endoscope has been of tremendous help in visualizing the tumor along the skull base, especially in multi-compartmental lesions.[4]

On the other hand, scar tissue and adhesions increase the risk of recurrent surgery. The capsule could be totally removed in about 70% of primary cases, in comparison to 17% of reoperations.[3],[4] Therefore, decision-making about the resection of capsule requires an individualized decision-making. GTR with capsule resection is achievable in the majority of patients; however, safe and maximal resection is always a justified and coveted goal.

 
  References Top

1.
Jha VC, Shrivastava A, Jha N, Rewatkar S, Singh SK. Analysis of giant intraventricular and extraventricular epidermoids, defining risk factors for recurrence, an institutional experience. Asian J Neurosurg (ahead of print) [In the press].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Aboud E, Abolfotoh M, Pravdenkova S, Gokoglu A, Gokden M, Al-Mefty O. Giant intracranial epidermoids: Is total removal feasible? J Neurosurg 2015;122:743-56.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shear BM, Jin L, Zhang Y, David WB, Fomchenko EI, Erson-Omay EZ, et al. Extent of resection of epidermoid tumors and risk of recurrence: Case report and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2020;133:291-301.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Forbes JA, Banu M, Lehner K, Ottenhausen M, La Corte E, Alalade AF, et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of epidermoid cysts involving the ventral cranial base. J Neurosurg 2019;130:1599-1608.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hasegawa M, Nouri M, Nagahisa S, Yoshida K, Adachi K, Inamasu J, et al. Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: Clinical presentations and surgical outcome. Neurosurg Rev 2016;39:259-66.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mizobuchi Y, Shouno K, Nakajima K, Nagahiro S. Trigeminal neuralgia caused by fibrous bands: Case illustration. J Neurosurg 2016;2016:186-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
<
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed796    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal