Asian Journal of Neurosurgery

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1--5

Predictors of visual outcome with transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas having suprasellar extension: A prospective series of 100 cases and brief review of the literature


Amit Kumar Thotakura1, Mohana Rao Patibandla2, Manas K Panigrahi3, Gokul Chowdary Addagada1,  
1 Department of Neurosurgery, NRI Academy of Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Denver, United States
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Amit Kumar Thotakura
Department of Neurosurgery, NRI Academy of Medical Sciences, Chinakakani, Andhra Pradesh
India

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to assess the factors influencing the visual outcome following trans-sphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas. Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients of pituitary adenomas with suprasellar extension (SSE) were operated by trans-sphenoidal approach from July 2003 to December 2006. There were 52 male and 48 female patients with a mean age of 42.47 years. The visual impairment score, which was used to evaluate the visual outcome was produced by adding the scores for visual acuity and visual field defects of each patient (from the tables of the German Ophthalmological Society). The mean diameter, the SSE and the parasellar extension of the lesion were noted in the magnetic resonance imaging study. The average follow-up was 43.5 months. Results: The mean diameter of the tumor was 32.97 mm, and the mean SSE was 14.95 mm. The parasellar extension was present in 27 patients. The vision improved in 61 of the 71 patients (85.91%). The shorter the duration of visual symptoms and smaller the size of the lesion resulted in better visual outcome. The age and the preoperative visual impairment did not show any correlation with the visual outcome. Conclusions: Patients with visual symptoms of <1-year duration (P < 0.01) and adenomas of <36.5 mm diameter (P < 0.009) have better visual outcome.



How to cite this article:
Thotakura AK, Patibandla MR, Panigrahi MK, Addagada GC. Predictors of visual outcome with transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas having suprasellar extension: A prospective series of 100 cases and brief review of the literature.Asian J Neurosurg 2017;12:1-5


How to cite this URL:
Thotakura AK, Patibandla MR, Panigrahi MK, Addagada GC. Predictors of visual outcome with transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas having suprasellar extension: A prospective series of 100 cases and brief review of the literature. Asian J Neurosurg [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 28 ];12:1-5
Available from: http://www.asianjns.org/text.asp?2017/12/1/1/149995


Full Text

 Introduction



Pituitary adenomas represent 10-12% of all intracranial tumors. Despite their histologically benign nature, the mass effect on the optic apparatus and adjacent structures and the endocrinological dysfunction necessitates prompt and adequate treatment of these neoplasms. The preferred treatment is surgical removal by the trans-sphenoidal route because it is less invasive and allows a direct approach to the pituitary gland. Several factors like the age,[1] the preoperative visual impairment,[1],[2] the duration of the visual symptoms,[1],[3] the size of the lesion influence the visual outcome following excision. In the present study, we analyzed the factors affecting the visual outcome in pituitary adenomas with suprasellar extension (SSE).

 Materials and Methods



One hundred consecutive patients of pituitary adenomas with SSE operated by trans-sphenoidal approach from July 2003 to December 2006 were included. During this period, 138 patients with pituitary adenomas were treated surgically in the Department of Neurosurgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India. Pure intrasellar lesions and adenomas with extrasellar extension operated through transcranial approach (38) were excluded.

Of the 100 patients, 52 were males, and 48 were females. Age range was 14-74 years with a mean of 42.47 ± 1.32 years. Most of these patients were in third to sixth decades of life. Along with the neurological examination, the patients were evaluated by ophthalmological, endocrinological and imageological workup. The visual acuity, visual field charting and the fundus examination of each patient were evaluated. The ophthalmological findings of visual acuity and visual fields were analyzed according to the guidelines of the German Ophthalmological Society.[4]

The scores for visual acuity and visual field defects in each patient were added, thus providing the visual impairment score (VIS), which enabled an exact comparison between subsequent examinations in each patient. A change in the score of more than 5% was considered to be improvement or deterioration.[5] Endocrine workup included thyroid profile, serum cortisol level at 8 a.m., serum prolactin level, serum growth hormone level, serum insulin like growth factor - 1, serum luteinizing hormone and serum follicular stimulating hormone.

All the patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain plain with or without contrast. The adenomas were classified into microadenoma (up to 10 mm), macroadenoma (>10-40 mm), giant adenoma (>40 mm). A spherical volume distribution was assumed, and the estimated mean diameter of the tumor was used for further calculations. In the craniocaudal direction, the SSE was measured. A line was drawn on the mid-sagittal image from the tuberculum sellae to the upper end of the dorsum sellae to define the sella entrance. The maximal SSE perpendicular to that line was measured on the mid-sagittal section.[6] The degree of SSE was graded into 4 grades, grade A (moderate SSE up to 10 mm), grade B (Large SSE up to 20 mm), grade C (Very large SSE up to 30 mm) and grade D (huge SSE in excess of 30 mm).[7] Parasellar extension of the adenoma was done according to Knosp et al. classification.[8]

Standard endonasal microscopic trans-sphenoidal approach was used for the surgical excision. The excision rates were classified into 4 grades based upon the amount of the residual lesion that was present in MRI at 3 months follow-up after excision as shown in [Table 1].{Table 1}

The diagnosis of pituitary adenoma was confirmed histopathologically in all the patients. Postoperative mortality was defined as all the deaths that occurred within 1-month of the surgery. The average follow-up was 43.5 (3-82) months. All the patients were assessed at the end of 3 months, 6 months, 1-year and then each year following surgery clinically, ophthalmologically, endocrinologically and imageologically. Postoperative MRI was done between 3 and 6 months following surgery and every year later on.

Data were entered in Excel software (Microsoft, Seattle, WA) and was analyzed using SPSS software, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means and standard deviations were computed for continuous variables and marginal distributions for categorical variables. Comparison of categorical variables between the two was performed using the Chi-square test, and a P < 0.05 was considered significant. Comparison of continuous variables between the two groups was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Logistic regression with forward conditional was used when multivariate analysis was required.

 Results



The clinical features of the patients were tabulated in [Table 2].{Table 2}

The mean diameter of the tumor was 32.97 ± 1.03 (13-60) mm. The mean SSE was 14.95 ± 0.70 (2-40) mm. The parasellar extension was present in 27 patients. There were 1 and 8 patients of grade 1 and 2 parasellar extension respectively. There were 7 and 11 patients of grade 3 and 4 parasellar extension respectively with invasion of cavernous sinus. There were 15 patients with infrasellar extension into the sphenoid sinus. There were 14 patients with giant pituitary adenomas.

Depending on the endocrine function of the adenoma, the patients were classified into functioning and nonfunctioning adenomas. There were 44 functioning adenomas with 24 prolactinomas and 20 GH secreting adenomas. Rest of the 56 patients had nonfunctioning adenomas.

There were 71 patients with preoperative visual impairment. Vision improved in 61 of the 71 patients (85.91%). Vision was normalized in 31 patients. Vision remained same in 6 patients and deteriorated in 1 patient.

Among the 71 patients who had preoperative visual impairment, only 66 patients had visual symptoms, and the rest had occult deficits. The mean duration of visual symptoms is 11.77 (0.15-100) months. Thirty-eight patients had visual symptoms of < 1-year duration and 25 patients had visual symptoms more than or equal to 1-year duration. Postoperatively 1 patients died with myocardial infarction.

The patients with duration of visual symptoms < 1-year had better visual outcome compared with those with longer duration (P < 0.009) with odds ratio of 11.68 [Table 3]. We analyzed the correlation between the age and visual outcome; there was no statistically significant correlation (P < 0.396). The mean preoperative VIS of the patients whose vision had improved (n = 61) was 53.45 ± 4.56, where as that of the patients whose vision remained same or deteriorated (n = 7) was 54 ± 12.09. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.969). Visual outcome was inversely correlated with the size of the adenoma with statistical significance (P < 0.010) as shown in [Table 3]. Receiver operating characteristic was used to assess the significance of the correlation between the two variables, mean diameter and the visual outcome. The area under the curve was more than 0.75, which was significant. The best cut-off was 36.5 mm with a sensitivity of 0.857 and a specificity of 0.724.{Table 3}

The mean diameter and the mean SSE of the lesion were correlated to the duration of the visual symptoms (P < 0.009). The mean diameter (P < 0.007) and the mean SSE of the lesion (P < 0.002) were positively correlated with the preoperative visual impairment. There was a positive correlation between the preoperative visual impairment and the degree of the visual improvement with surgery (P < 0.001). A scatter plot graph was drawn and a formula was derived from the graph with which the degree of the visual improvement (VIS change) can be expected with the preoperative VIS [Graph 1]. List of the complications were tabulated in [Table 4]. Duration of visual symptoms are correlated with impairment scores and tumor dimensions and are tabulated [Table 5].[INLINE:1]{Table 4}{Table 5}

The formula is visual impairment score change = (pre operative visual impairment score X 1.2) – 30.

 Discussion



Pituitary adenomas represent 10-12% of all intracranial tumors. Despite their histological benign nature, the mass effect on the optic apparatus, third ventricle, cavernous sinus structures, the endocrine dysfunction and the apoplexy necessitates prompt and adequate treatment. Various treatment options available are medical, surgical excision and radiotherapy depending on the hormonal activity of the tumor. The preferred treatment for the nonfunctional pituitary macro adenoma is surgical removal by the trans-sphenoidal route, as it is less invasive and allows a direct approach to the pituitary gland. Several factors like the age,[1] the preoperative visual impairment,[1],[2] the duration of the visual symptoms,[1],[9] the size of the lesion [9] influence the visual outcome following excision. In the present study, we analyzed the factors affecting the visual outcome in patients with pituitary adenomas with SSE following transnasal trans-sphenoidal excision.

Cohen et al.,[1] in their study observed that the visual outcome (for both acuity and fields) was better in patients < 52 years. Sullivan et al.[5] and Powell [7] and present study concluded that patient age was not predictive of postoperative visual acuity. The reason for the inconsistency regarding the effect of age on the visual outcome was not clear. It may be related to the differences in the patient population studied, including the differences in duration of the visual symptomatology, preoperative visual impairment and mean size of the tumor.

Cohen et al.[1] in their study observed that the visual outcome was better with shorter duration of symptoms. Symon et al.[9] reported that the degree of visual improvement correlated with the duration of visual complaints. In this study, it was observed that longer the duration of the symptoms, poorer was the visual outcome [Graph 2]. This result could be because the increase in duration of the visual symptoms resulted in the irreversible injury to the compressed visual pathways either by mechanical compression or by the vascular compromise.[INLINE:2]

According to Cohen et al.[1] better visual acuity outcome was seen in patients with lesser degree of preoperative visual acuity compromise.[1] Gnanalingham et al.[2] reported that the extent of the visual field recovery was mainly dependent on the preoperative visual field deficit. Sullivan et al. in their retrospective study of 45 patients concluded that the preoperative visual acuity was not predictive of postoperative visual acuity.[5] Powell in his series of 67 patients, reported that preoperative visual defect did not correlate to the postoperative visual recovery.[7] In the present study, there was no statistically significant correlation between the severity of preoperative visual impairment and the visual outcome. Agrawal and Mahapatra concluded that even if the preoperative visual impairment is severe, better visual outcome can be achieved if the duration of the symptoms is less.[10] Symon et al. reported that the degree of visual improvement correlated with the size of the lesion.[9] In our study, we noted that better visual outcome will be achieved in patients with adenomas with mean diameter size < 36.5 mm (P < 0.010) [Table 3].

Visual outcomes of the different series were compared in [Table 6].{Table 6} [15]

 Conclusions



The analysis of the results of the trans-sphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas with SSE resulted in the following conclusions. Patients with visual symptoms of < 1-year duration and adenomas of < 36.5 mm size have better visual outcome.

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks Prof. A. K. Reddy, Prof. A.K. Purohit and Dr. M. Vijayasaradhi for their contribution in the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Cohen AR, Cooper PR, Kupersmith MJ, Flamm ES, Ransohoff J. Visual recovery after transsphenoidal removal of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 1985;17:446-52.
2Gnanalingham KK, Bhattacharjee S, Pennington R, Ng J, Mendoza N. The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: Predictive factors for a good outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:415-9.
3Svien HJ, Love JG, Kennedy WC, Colby MY Jr, Kearns TP. Status of vision following surgical treatment for pituitary chromophobe adenoma. J Neurosurg 1965;22:47-52.
4Fahlbusch R, Schott W. Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: Surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 2002;96:235-43.
5Sullivan LJ, O'Day J, McNeill P. Visual outcomes of pituitary adenoma surgery. St. Vincent's Hospital 1968-1987. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 1991;11:262-7.
6Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: A magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993;33:610-7.
7Powell M. Recovery of vision following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Br J Neurosurg 1995;9:367-73.
8Mohr G, Hardy J, Comtois R, Beauregard H. Surgical management of giant pituitary adenomas. Can J Neurol Sci 1990;17:62-6.
9Symon L, Jakubowski J. Transcranial management of pituitary tumours with suprasellar extension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:123-33.
10Agrawal D, Mahapatra AK. Visual outcome of blind eyes in pituitary apoplexy after transsphenoidal surgery: A series of 14 eyes. Surg Neurol 2005;63:42-6.
11Ebersold MJ, Quast LM, Laws ER Jr, Scheithauer B, Randall RV. Long-term results in transsphenoidal removal of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 1986;64:713-9.
12Bevan JS, Adams CB, Burke CW, Morton KE, Molyneux AJ, Moore RA, et al. Factors in the outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma and non-functioning pituitary tumour, including pre-operative bromocriptine therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1987;26:541-56.
13Shone GR, Richards SH, Hourihan MD, Hall R, Thomas JP, Scanlon MF. Non-secretory adenomas of the pituitary treated by trans-ethmoidal sellotomy. J R Soc Med 1991;84:140-3.
14Marazuela M, Astigarraga B, Vicente A, Estrada J, Cuerda C, García-Uría J, et al. Recovery of visual and endocrine function following transsphenoidal surgery of large nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Endocrinol Invest 1994;17:703-7.
15Mortini P, Losa M, Barzaghi R, Boari N, Giovanelli M. Results of transsphenoidal surgery in a large series of patients with pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery 2005;56:1222-33.